Judicial Response and Father's Written Response will be uploaded shortly
COMMONWEALTH
OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE
TRIAL COURT
PROBATE
AND FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENT
Plymouth Division Docket
No.: PL06D-0566-DV1
______________________________
M. John Joseph, )
Plaintiff )
)
) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
v. ) AFFIDAVIT
)
)
Laura Bonetzky-Joseph, )
Defendant )
______________________________)
I, Laura,
Bonetzky-Joseph, submit the following response to Father’s Affidavit:
1.
TRUE
2.
TRUE
3.
FALSE as evidenced at trial. Mother did NOT do
anything voluntary.
4.
FALSE.
a.
Mark Kaeys was unavailable and Mother cannot
afford the excessive costs for supervised visits that were ordered as a direct
result of Father being found guilty of violating over 90% of previous
visitations despite court order. Same standards for Mother have not been applied
to Father.
b.
Since January 2013, Mother has repeated pled
with the court for assistance in this matter which Court did not.
5.
FALSE as evidenced at trial as well as by NUMEROUS
pleas by Mother at every court hearing.
6.
FALSE
a.
This is a violation of Mother’s religious freedoms
and constitutional rights. Mother considers the acts by Father to be a hate
crime.
b.
Attorney Arabasz was permitted by this court to
grill Mother on her religion during trial for three out of the twelve hours of
trial with no reprimands.
c.
The change of this courts stance on this case
changed after this line of questioning of Mother’s religion was permitted by
this court.
d.
Mother’s religious actions are done during times
that do not interfere with court or job search and are supported by her
religious community.
e.
Father failed to mention Mother’s other
religious volunteerism for Hospice, Numerous Animal Shelters, Breast Cancer, Beth
Israel Hospital, and American Cancer Society where ANY proceeds and been
donated NOT just this domestic abuser’s repeated threats and attacks on a local
organization that specializes in interpersonal violence.
f.
Court ordered community service does interfere
with job search since community service is during the week day three days a
week not two as Father states which again is deliberately intended to mislead
this court.
g.
Mother has lost out on four job offers due to
community service.
h.
Mother has lost out on three job fairs due to community
service.
i.
Mother has lost out on job interviews as a
direct result of community service.
j.
The community service is punitive in nature and
serves NO remedial benefit.
k.
Exhibits have been altered to omit the truth.
Dates have been changed and/or omitted from the copies to distort the facts.
l.
Mother asks the Courts to PLEASE place sanctions
and penalties against Father and Attorney Arabasz for such gross distortion of
facts. NOT to mention, this just adds to the proof of Mother’s pleas for
assistance to put an end to the abuse, harassment, and stalking by Father and
Attorney Arabasz. (It shall be noted that Attorney Arabasz once again VERBALLY
assaulted and threatened Mother in the Courthouse in August 2013.)
m. These actions by Father are NOT in the best
interests of the children.
7.
TRUE
8.
FALSE
9.
FALSE – Mother seeks the Court’s assistance in
putting an end to the abusive, threatening, and harassing conduct by Attorney
Arabaz and Father and requests the court to place sanctions, penalties, and
criminal charges for perjury in their deliberate attempts to mislead this
Honorable Court and to cause deliberate malicious harm to Mother which is NOT
in the best interests of the children.
10. FALSE
11. FALSE
12. FALSE
a.
Mother is threatened with six months of
incarceration if Mother does not comply with paying child support.
b.
The court did NOT address Mother’s repeated pleas
for addressing visitation.
c.
Mother has not seen her children since August 3,
2011 by no fault of her own.
d.
Father violated over 90% of pervious visitation order
and was found guilty of contempt. The same standards that have been applied to
Mother have NOT been applied to Father and Mother was sanctioned by the courts
for Father’s failures to comply with visitation orders. Father was rewarded for his gross misconduct
despite case laws to support Mother’s arguments.
13. FALSE
– Mother does NOT know what Father is talking about.
14. FALSE
15. FALSE
as evidenced by Mother’s past 10yrs of income with a peak annual income of
$16,000 in 2012. As a result of ongoing abuse by Father and his Attorney,
Mother now suffers from PTSD as evidenced by numerous medical letters.
16. FALSE
17. FALSE
–
a.
Father needs to be held accountable for his
repeated distortion of facts that are abusive, harassing, defaming, slanderous,
and malicious in intent and perjurous.
b.
Unemployment was initially denied and became
retroactively approved as evidenced by Father’s checks on 9/3/13.
Father did NOT
acknowledge the SAME FOURTH criminal complaint filed against Mother when Father
failed to coerce this court to incarcerated Mother for six months while refusing
100% of evidence supplied during the July 10, 2013 hearing. Father filed the
SAME complaint a FOURTH time in order to continue to discredit Mother in Family
Court and to continue his repeated abuses of the legal system to cause
malicious harm to Mother. However, this FOURTH criminal complaint was dismissed
for the FOURTH time and Father was told he will not be allowed to file the
complaint again.
Mother seeks
restitution in this matter as Father has used these FALSE criminal complaints successfully
against Mother in the past in this court to keep Mother from having any normal
relationships with her children and to discredit her costing her many
employment opportunities, good health, loss of any meaningful bonds or relationship
with her children and her family, and so much more that unfortunately a court
cannot place a value on. Father’s REPEATED abusive acts are consistently
demonstrating to NOT be in the best interests of the children.
Father and his
attorney testified in June 2013 and July 2013 that they will not be seeking any
more legal fees because they know Mother doesn’t have any money or assets to
draw from. I think that testimony in itself should refute their own affidavit
and agenda.
Mr. Joseph has
testified under oath on numerous occasions that he is “federally licensed by
the federal government”, which is FALSE.
Father is not a licensed federal agent of the government as he claims to
be. Father uses is Series 6, 63, and 26 securities investment broker’s license
and his mortgage broker’s license to access Mother’s private confidential
information unlawfully as testified and evidenced on numerous occasions before
this court. These unlawful acts have
been brought before this court on numerous occasions without consequences to
the Father.
Father has
testified to these unlawful acts and provided evidence with the help of
Attorney Arabasz on numerous occasions before this court admitting to going to
any means possible to stalk, harass, defame, slander, and to steal any private
confidential information for the purposes other than what is before this court
without consequences.
Father has
testified falsely and maliciously under oath with fabricated evidence on
numerous occasions with no consequences by this court.
Father has
testified on numerous occasions that if he does not like what this court
orders, he will NOT abide by those orders. He has failed to abide by the court’s
orders with NO consequences.
Father has
testified in court on numerous occasions that his authority supersedes the
authority of this court with no consequences, sanctions, or penalties.
Father has
repeatedly perjured himself before this court for acts such as to be a
handwriting expert among other perjured statements with intent to deliberately
mislead this court with no consequences.
Father has repeatedly
violated prior visitation orders on 90% of the visits with NO consequences, penalties,
or sanctions.
It shall be noted,
NO sanctions, penalties or actions have been placed against Father for failing
to abide by court ordered Therapy for the said children.
Father has failed
to comply with court ordered phone calls with NO sanctions, penalties, or
actions.
Father has failed
to comply with divorce degree of summer added child expenses of $100 per week
for the summer of 2007 with NO sanctions, penalties, or actions.
Father has failed
to provide Mother with HALF of tax returns funds as per divorce decree from
2006 and 2007 with NO sanctions, penalties, or actions despite Mother’s
repeated requests for court intervention.
Furthermore, since
Father’s response FAILED to respond to any relevant facts of case laws or of
the State of Massachusetts law of due process. Since Father did not address
these citings by Mother, then Father must agree by omission. Father also failed
to cite any relevant case laws or facts of law to refute Mother’s Motion for
Reconsideration.
Father’s behavior
is consistent with abuse by proxy, perjury, stalking, witness intimidation, threats,
theft, harassment, coercion, manipulation, and fabrication which has been
allowed on numerous occasions and NOT in the best interests of the children.
Exhibit “A” – Father’s financial lean
from Discover Card of $4,900 dated 4/26/10. This is consistent with Father’s
behavior to maliciously attack Mother financially and demonstrates why Father
is so insistent to coerce this court to incarcerate Mother as well as file FOUR
criminal complaints of Mother stealing her own money on a house that legally
belonged to her. This PROVES Father has deliberately misled this court with his
true intensions as documented by Father’s
response to FINRA dated 5/22/13 … the SAME date Mother was incarcerated and
Father did NOT receive the monies Mother he attempted to extort from her using
this court despite her inability to comply.
Exhibit “B” – Father’s Affidavit
The same standards that have been applied
to Mother, have NOT been applied to Father, and Mother asks for the same
standards to apply without discrimination.
Signed under the pains and
penalties of perjury,
Laura Bonetzky-Joseph 10/4/13
No comments:
Post a Comment